1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 95 kg more than 2005 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford Crestline has manual transmission. 1953 Ford Crestline will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford Crestline | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Crestline | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1311 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1385 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2680 mm |
