1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Mazda 2
To start off, 2009 Mazda 2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 325 kg more than 2009 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Ford Crestline | 2009 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Crestline | 2 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2500 mm |
