1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (145 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 238 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford Crestline | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Crestline | 3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1242 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2650 mm |