1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 70 kg more than 1953 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford Crestline | 2009 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Crestline | Tribute |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2630 mm |