1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra

To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 204 kg more than 1953 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1953 Ford Crestline has manual transmission. 1953 Ford Crestline will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: