1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2010 Proton Satria
To start off, 2010 Proton Satria is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Proton Satria (109 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Proton Satria should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 321 kg more than 2010 Proton Satria.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Proton Satria, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford Crestline | 2010 Proton Satria | |
Make | Ford | Proton |
Model | Crestline | Satria |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2450 mm |