1953 Ford Crestline vs. 2013 Mazda 3
To start off, 2013 Mazda 3 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1953 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 177 kg more than 2013 Mazda 3.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Ford Crestline | 2013 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Crestline | 3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3929 cc | 2489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1303 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4595 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2640 mm |