1953 GAZ M-20 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,119 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1953 GAZ M-20. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1953 GAZ M-20.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1953 GAZ M-20 has manual transmission. 1953 GAZ M-20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 GAZ M-20 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | GAZ | Ford |
| Model | M-20 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2119 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2490 mm |
