1953 GAZ M-20 vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1953 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1953 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6.
Because 1953 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (230 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 GAZ M-20 | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | GAZ | Mazda |
| Model | M-20 | 6 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2119 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |
