1953 GAZ M-20 vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,119 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Smart ForFour (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1953 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1953 GAZ M-20.
Because 1953 GAZ M-20 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 GAZ M-20. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Smart ForFour (136 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Smart ForFour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 GAZ M-20 | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | GAZ | Smart |
| Model | M-20 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 2119 cc | 1123 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |
