1953 GAZ M-20 vs. 2010 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2010 GMC Canyon is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Canyon (182 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1953 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1953 GAZ M-20.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Canyon (190 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 GAZ M-20. (125 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 GAZ M-20 | 2010 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | GAZ | GMC |
| Model | M-20 | Canyon |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2119 cc | 2901 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 182 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 125 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2830 mm |
