1953 Holden FX vs. 1950 Maserati 4CLT
To start off, 1953 Holden FX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati 4CLT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati 4CLT would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Maserati 4CLT (276 HP) has 225 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Maserati 4CLT should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Holden FX weights approximately 350 kg more than 1950 Maserati 4CLT.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Holden FX | 1950 Maserati 4CLT | |
| Make | Holden | Maserati |
| Model | FX | 4CLT |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 276 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 620 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2510 mm |
