1953 Holden FX vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1959 Triumph Herald is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Holden FX (51 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Holden FX weights approximately 208 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Holden FX (136 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm). This means 1953 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Holden FX | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Holden | Triumph |
Model | FX | Herald |
Year Released | 1953 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 762 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2330 mm |