1953 Holden FX vs. 1964 Renault 8
To start off, 1964 Renault 8 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Renault 8 (95 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Renault 8 should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Holden FX weights approximately 117 kg more than 1964 Renault 8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Renault 8. (99 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1953 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Renault 8.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Holden FX | 1964 Renault 8 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | 8 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 95 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2280 mm |