1953 Holden FX vs. 1967 Renault 8
To start off, 1967 Renault 8 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Holden FX (51 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1967 Renault 8. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Holden FX weights approximately 230 kg more than 1967 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Holden FX | 1967 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FX | 8 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 47 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2280 mm |
