1953 Holden FX vs. 1978 Renault 4

To start off, 1978 Renault 4 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Holden FX (51 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1978 Renault 4. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1978 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Holden FX weights approximately 274 kg more than 1978 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Renault 4. (62 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1953 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Renault 4.

Compare all specifications: