1953 Holden FX vs. 1980 Renault Fuego

To start off, 1980 Renault Fuego is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Renault Fuego (63 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Renault Fuego should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Renault Fuego weights approximately 44 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault Fuego, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Renault Fuego. (103 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1953 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Renault Fuego.

Compare all specifications: