1953 Holden FX vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega

To start off, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega (89 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Omega weights approximately 160 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Oldsmobile Omega (183 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 Oldsmobile Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: