1953 Holden FX vs. 1990 Volvo 940
To start off, 1990 Volvo 940 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 940 (111 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 940 should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 940 weights approximately 404 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Volvo 940 (157 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1990 Volvo 940 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Holden FX | 1990 Volvo 940 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | FX | 940 |
Year Released | 1953 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2780 mm |