1953 Holden FX vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna

To start off, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,554 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (114 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 365 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Mitsubishi Magna (198 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1992 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: