1953 Holden FX vs. 2001 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2001 Mercury Cougar is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,543 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Cougar (196 HP) has 145 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 437 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercury Cougar (228 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2001 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications: