1953 Holden FX vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (108 HP) has 57 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 790 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (270 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Holden FX | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | FX | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2540 mm |