1953 Holden FX vs. 2006 Honda CR-V

To start off, 2006 Honda CR-V is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,204 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda CR-V (138 HP) has 87 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Honda CR-V weights approximately 728 kg more than 1953 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda CR-V (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Holden FX 2006 Honda CR-V
Make Holden Honda
Model FX CR-V
Year Released 1953 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2166 cc 2204 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 138 HP
Torque 136 Nm 340 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1698 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4640 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2640 mm