1953 Holden FX vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 100 kg more than 1953 Holden FX.
Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (148 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Holden FX | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | Clio |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 148 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |