1953 Holden FX vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2

To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (227 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX.

Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (234 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX. 2009 Land Rover LR2 has automatic transmission and 1953 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1953 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Land Rover LR2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: