1953 Holden FX vs. 2011 Renault Megane
To start off, 2011 Renault Megane is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Megane (221 HP) has 170 more horse power than 1953 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1953 Holden FX.
Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Renault Megane (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2011 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Holden FX | 2011 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | FX | Megane |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 221 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |
