1953 Holden FX vs. 2012 Volvo S60
To start off, 2012 Volvo S60 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S60 weights approximately 639 kg more than 1953 Holden FX.
Because 1953 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo S60 has automatic transmission and 1953 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1953 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S60 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Holden FX | 2012 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | FX | S60 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2166 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2776 mm |