1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 1960 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1960 Triumph Herald is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1960 Triumph Herald. (35 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1960 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 1060 kg more than 1960 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Hornet | 1960 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Hudson | Triumph |
Model | Hornet | Herald |
Year Released | 1953 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2320 mm |