1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 1980 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1980 Zastava 1500 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 760 kg more than 1980 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Hornet | 1980 Zastava 1500 | |
| Make | Hudson | Zastava |
| Model | Hornet | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1479 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1040 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2430 mm |
