1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 1990 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1990 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Hornet (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 625 kg more than 1990 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Hornet | 1990 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Hudson | Plymouth |
Model | Hornet | Sundance |
Year Released | 1953 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2470 mm |