1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 2002 Mahindra Scorpio
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Scorpio is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Hornet (143 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2002 Mahindra Scorpio. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2002 Mahindra Scorpio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Scorpio weights approximately 10 kg more than 1953 Hudson Hornet.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Hornet | 2002 Mahindra Scorpio | |
| Make | Hudson | Mahindra |
| Model | Hornet | Scorpio |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2609 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 108 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1810 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2690 mm |
