1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 2004 Oldsmobile Alero
To start off, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Hornet (143 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. (140 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 462 kg more than 2004 Oldsmobile Alero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Oldsmobile Alero, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Hornet | 2004 Oldsmobile Alero | |
Make | Hudson | Oldsmobile |
Model | Hornet | Alero |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 140 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1338 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2720 mm |