1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Hornet | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Hudson | Mazda |
| Model | Hornet | 3 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2650 mm |
