1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 2006 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2006 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota 4Runner (260 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 153 kg more than 1953 Hudson Hornet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota 4Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Hornet | 2006 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Hudson | Toyota |
Model | Hornet | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 4670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2800 mm |