1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 402 kg more than 2009 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 1953 Hudson Hornet has manual transmission. 1953 Hudson Hornet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Hornet | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Hudson | Jeep |
Model | Hornet | Commander |
Year Released | 1953 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4810 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1398 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2790 mm |