1953 Hudson Hornet vs. 2010 Seat Exeo
To start off, 2010 Seat Exeo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Seat Exeo (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Hornet. (143 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Hornet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 400 kg more than 2010 Seat Exeo.
Because 1953 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Seat Exeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Hornet | 2010 Seat Exeo | |
| Make | Hudson | Seat |
| Model | Hornet | Exeo |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4810 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1772 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2642 mm |
