1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 1954 Singer Hunter
To start off, 1954 Singer Hunter is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1954 Singer Hunter. (47 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1954 Singer Hunter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 459 kg more than 1954 Singer Hunter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 1954 Singer Hunter | |
Make | Hudson | Singer |
Model | Super Wasp | Hunter |
Year Released | 1953 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2180 mm |