1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 1964 Maserati Mistral
To start off, 1964 Maserati Mistral is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (243 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 349 kg more than 1964 Maserati Mistral.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 1964 Maserati Mistral | |
| Make | Hudson | Maserati |
| Model | Super Wasp | Mistral |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3694 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 243 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2410 mm |
