1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 6,375 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 171 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 1964 Pontiac Bonneville | |
Make | Hudson | Pontiac |
Model | Super Wasp | Bonneville |
Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 6375 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3130 mm |