1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 1965 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1965 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 699 kg more than 1965 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 1965 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Hudson | Nissan |
| Model | Super Wasp | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1189 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2290 mm |
