1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (62 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 729 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Hudson | Subaru |
Model | Super Wasp | R2 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 103 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 56 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 66.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 30 L |