1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2004 Rover City is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Hudson | Rover |
Model | Super Wasp | City |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2410 mm |