1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 701 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Hudson | Toyota |
Model | Super Wasp | Sequoia |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 99 L |