1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Hudson | Jeep |
Model | Super Wasp | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 72 L |