1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2005 Toyota Vitz

To start off, 2005 Toyota Vitz is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Vitz. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Vitz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 549 kg more than 2005 Toyota Vitz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Vitz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Vitz. (141 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Vitz.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Hudson Super Wasp 2005 Toyota Vitz
Make Hudson Toyota
Model Super Wasp Vitz
Year Released 1953 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4293 cc 1491 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 349 Nm 141 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 7.0:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1599 kg 1050 kg
Vehicle Length 5160 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 42 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]