1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2006 Alfa Romeo GT
To start off, 2006 Alfa Romeo GT is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Alfa Romeo GT (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo GT should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 159 kg more than 2006 Alfa Romeo GT.
Because 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Alfa Romeo GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Alfa Romeo GT. (305 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Alfa Romeo GT. 2006 Alfa Romeo GT has automatic transmission and 1953 Hudson Super Wasp has manual transmission. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Alfa Romeo GT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2006 Alfa Romeo GT | |
Make | Hudson | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Super Wasp | GT |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 1909 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 349 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 18.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 63 L |