1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2006 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Defender is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Land Rover Defender weights approximately 483 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Because 2006 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Land Rover Defender. (300 Nm @ 1950 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Land Rover Defender.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2006 Land Rover Defender | |
| Make | Hudson | Land Rover |
| Model | Super Wasp | Defender |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2495 cc |
| Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 349 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 90.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 97 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 2082 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 75 L |
