1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander

To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander (160 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 189 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Hudson Super Wasp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Hudson Super Wasp 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander
Make Hudson Mitsubishi
Model Super Wasp Outlander
Year Released 1953 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4293 cc 2376 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 349 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 90.5 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 111.1 mm 100 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 7.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1599 kg 1788 kg
Vehicle Length 5160 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1980 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 59 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]