1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Hudson | Holden |
Model | Super Wasp | UTE |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 349 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |