1953 Hudson Super Wasp vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 921 kg more than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. (349 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Hudson Super Wasp.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Hudson Super Wasp | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Hudson | Jeep |
Model | Super Wasp | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 349 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 90.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 17.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1599 kg | 2520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 78 L |